Structure
Section 1: Intro
Section 2: Quote
Section 3:
The overall structure of
the article and;
How the intro and quote
usage play into the overall structure?
Section 1 Intro
The article’s intro fit into the category of what is been
refer to as Delay intro, sub category teaser intro
What is Delay intro
The delayed intro is also called the buried lead. It consists of two or more sentences or
paragraphs and relies on contrast or surprise.
Calculated to raise expectations, it makes readers feel they must read
on. The danger is that instead of
reading on readers simply will ask ‘so what?’ Care should be taken in using
such intros in news stories. That is why
the delayed intro is more common in news features and colour stories. The following example is from the 23~24
December 2000 Weekend Australian:
A can of salmon has
achieved in the past week what many cyberprenurs have failed to do for years
success on the Internet.
John West’s amusing
canned salmon ad, featuring bear and a fisherman having a fight intended for
British television only, flew via email around the world and drew an audience
that well funded sites have only dreamt of. (Paraphrase from reading)
What is Teaser intro
In a teaser intro the key point is saved until later in the
story. The writer of a delayed intro is
still attempting to grab the reader’s attention by tempting the read to read
on. The idea is to string the readers
along until they are well into the story where the main news peg or main news
point is given.
Long Bay escapes Fred
Nurk went for a surf yesterday and came face to face with an off duty police
officer in bathers. (Paraphrase from readings)
Intro of the article
Tina Rinehart effectively put a gun to her own children’s heads by
telling them they would go bankrupt if they didn’t agree to hand over control
of the family’s multibillion dollar trust, the three eldest children claim.
|
Paragraph 1
Main Intro
|
Mislead the reader to believe in the existence of something that is
not there, to achieve the aim of drawing the readers into reading the article.
Mislead the reader to believe that Tina Rinhart has [literally] put a gun to her
own children’s head to force the children to give her control over the
family’s billion dollar trust. It is
only till paragraph 4 did the article explain to the reader it is
metaphorically.
|
Further documents from the legal battle over the future of the trust
released yesterday reveal the deep fractures in Australia’s richest family
after September 3 last year – the date on which Mrs Rinehart sent a letter to
her children given them one business day to sign a new deed of agreement
regarding the trust or face “financial ruin” in the form of a capital gains
tax bill.
|
Paragraph 2
Extended intro
|
Work in coalition with paragraph 1.
Further mislead the reader to believe in the existence of something
that is not there, to achieve the aim of drawing the readers into reading the
article
By presenting information about the court case between the mother and
children provide a perspective about the intensity of the conflict between
the mother and children over this trust and extend of forcefulness, which
Rinhart is using to force the children to sign the trust fund to her.
Working in coalition with paragraph 1. It misleads the readers to believe that
Rinhart is so forceful in forcing her children to sign the trust fund to her
that she even went to the extent of conducting physical violence, which is [literally] point a gun at her
children’s head.
|
In legal submissions, Mrs Rinehart’s three eldest children, john
Hancokc, Bianca Rinehart and Hope Rinehart Welker describe their mother’s
conduct as deceptive, manipulative, hopelessly conflicted and disgraceful”
|
Paragraph 3
Extended intro
|
the paragraph provided the reader with a statement where the article
introduce to the readers with a perspective, in regards to how these children
view their mother, a perspective that further increase the intensity, of the
conflict between the children and the mother,
Work in coalition with paragraph 1, 2 and 3. It mislead the readers to believe there is
an intense conflict between mother and children, over the family trust fund
and the conflict is so intense, that it eventually leads to the forceful
mother [literally]putting a
gun to the children’s head to force the children to hang the money to her.
|
|
They claimed: “The September 3 letter attached to the email on any
fair reading comprised nothing less than a gun to the plaintiff
benefifciaries’ heads, seeking to extract binding commitments that are
contrary to their interests.
|
Paragraph 4
First Paragraph after the main and extended intro
|
Only now does the article explain to the reads that Gina Rinheart did
not [literally] point a gun
at the children’s head, but it is a [metaphorical]
reference made by the children, but by this time the readers have been well
drawn into the story.
|
|
Usage of quotes
The usage of quotes within the article fit into the category
of what Ken Melzer refers to as Quote for Human colour and quote for
authenticity
Quote for human interest
Keep an ear attuned to the way people talk. Stay particularly alert for personal asides
offered in ways that you write. (Melzer, 1997)
In short, your story’s quotations should show individual
character stamps, each representing a style of expression distinctly different
from the way you write. Do that and your
writing become a rainbow of colourful expression, rather than a dull
monotone. (Melzer, 1997)
Quote for authenticity
A personality story that discusses its celebrity subject’s
shyness becomes more believable with a direct quote: “Yes,” says Mr. Big “I
suffer agony in anticipation of meeting somebody for fear they won’t like me.”
(Melzer, 1997)
In a similar vein, authenticity shows through quotes that
reflect the jargon of the topic. You
show the former hobo talking in the jargon of his past: “there we were, a
couple of bindle stiffs just off the red ball express, diming up on the stem.”
it sounds authentic, though you may have to translate the meaning-hobos just
off the fast fruit train, panhandling on Main Street. (Melzer, 1997)
They claim (children)‘The September 3 letter attached to the
email on any fair reading comprised nothing less than a gun to the plaintiff
beneficiaries’ heads, seeking to extract binding commitments that are contrary
to their interests.”
“Stop the nonsense,” she said (mother) in an email “you are
always saying you want a leadership role, but very sadly in the past you have
taken the wrong decisions.”
“I’m so lost with all of this, don’t know what to do” she
told Hope Rinehart Welker in an email on September 3
“I think he really does need to answer: ‘Why would he
involve himself in a personal family business?” independent MP Tony Windsor
said of
“Is he in the business of writing to everybody who has
children who might be in some sort of dispute with their parents?”
1.
Present the readers with a perspective of the
characteristics of individual characters, in relationship to the situation, as
if we are witnessing the event ourselves, including the characters’
·
personality,
·
perspective
·
and psychological stats of the character
rather then been told to us by
another character. Thus the usage of
quote includes the effect of quotes for human colour and quote for
authenticity.
2.
The usage of these quotes with these quotes thus
leads to the effect of making the readers in some way feel as if they are
watching the whole event unfold before their eye, as if they are watching a
reality show version of a day time soap opera, rather than receiving this
information second hand.
The overall structure of the article and how does the intro usage and quote usage fit into the structure of the article
Intro
Paragraph 1 (main intro)
and paragraph 2 and 3 (extended intro)
|
The intro played a huge part into the structure of the article, it
draw the readers into the article by misleading the readers to believe that
there are an intense conflict between a forceful mother and the children over
huge sum of money and the conflict over the money has became so intense that
it leads to a situation of physical violence, where the forceful mother
literally put a gun to the children’s head to force them sign the money to
her. It is not until paragraph 4 that
the article explains the act of pointing a gun to the head, is a metaphorical
reference the children made, towards their mother’s forceful behaviour, not a
literal act.
|
Paragraph 4
|
It is only now, in paragraph four did the article revealed the fact that
the mother did not literally put a gun to the children’s head, but it is a
metaphorical reference to some of their mother’s action, to force them to
give them the money.
They claim “The September 3
letter attached to the email on any fair reading comprised nothing less than
a gun to the plaintiff beneficiaries’ head, seeking to extract binding
commitments that are contrary to their interests.”
|
Main Intro
Paragraph 1
|
Mislead the reader to believe there is a literal act of a mother
pointing a gun to the children’s head, where in reality it is a metaphorical
reference.
|
Paragraph 2 and 3 (Body and extended intro)
|
Apart from been the extended intro of the article, where it assists
the main intro in misleading the readers.
Paragraph 2 and 3 also played into the role of the body of the
article, by presenting us the readers, with some information of the article.
|
Paragraph 5~ Paragraph 17 (Body)
|
1. the
article continue to present the readers with more information in regards to
the story, but even more,
2. started using quotes to present the readers
with a perspective of the characteristics of individual characters, in
relationship to the situation, including personality, perspective and
psychological stats of the character, as if we are witnessing the event
ourselves, rather then been told to us by another character.
3. The usage of these quotes with these quotes
thus leads to the effect of making the readers in some way feel as if they
are watching the whole event unfold before their eye, as if they are watching
a reality show version of a day time soap opera, rather than receiving this
information second hand.
|